How Do You Deliver Quality?

How Do You Deliver Quality?

The concepts around Quality are central to a lot in engineering.  We think about quality control in terms of delivering product that meets customer expectations.  In some industries that's considered in measurables like reaching certain size or tolerance targets.  When all the parts are "within" the dimensional specifications, we say deliver Quality product.  Indeed there is a whole industry around quality initiatives including ISO 9000 and their derivatives.

While the manufacturing world has learned a ton about holding tolerances for a Quality part, there are so many more aspects to consider.  While it works with physical "things", it's a little different in other industries like soft goods (clothing, furniture, home goods) and for virtual industries (like software).  It's harder to put calipers on a teddy bear or a new phone app to determine if it meets quality requirements.

Quality As A Mindset

I'll be first to admit that I'm not the Quality Control guru.  While it seems pretty clear that meeting tolerances makes a big difference in "Quality" products, that is just one small piece as we deliver a Quality process.  Even if parts are all to spec, who says they are "quality parts"?  What if the spec is wrong?

Secondly, quality in a kids toy is on a much different level than quality expected for the airliner taking you on vacation.

My father was a quality control guru - did it for a living and wrote an amazing book on it.  He pointed out that "Quality" is really a nebulous term with meaning derived from the consumer.  His famous quote which is very insightful "Quality is what the customer says it is."  That puts things in a very different perspective than measurements from a micrometer.  Truly, we may deliver quality with micrometer measurements, but that is not and does not make quality.

At Synthesis, we believe quality is much more than a measurement at the part or dimension level.  It's the whole product.  I suppose when the product is one piece, that puts a kink in the concept, but most things are an array of parts that make up the whole product - and that's where the customer interacts.  We deal with the topic straight on from the start by evaluating The Triangle of Achievable Engineering.

Automotive Quality Example:

While working in the Automotive industry, one of my jobs was evaluating competitive products.  When a new product from a competitor would come out, we would get one and do all sorts of testing.  In any industry it is important to know where your completion is.

Did Allante Deliver Quality?This will date me, but years ago when the NorthStar Engine first came out in the Cadillac Allante, it got a lot of attention.  The Allante was touted as a showcase vehicle.  Certainly, it had amazing specs - like the NorthStar Engine, a new amazing suspension, dignified looks, and so much more.

As a powertrain engineer, my big interest was the new NorthStar Engine and the new Transmission made for it.

Certainly the new car spec was enticing, and I was quite excited to drive it.  Would it deliver quality in person the way it looks on paper?

Near the same time period, another important car was launched.  The Dodge Neon first came out in 1994 as an ultra cheap Japanese small car killer.  It had an underpowered iron block motor and a 3-Speed TorqueFlite automatic transmission.  (I can't find documentation, but my memory says the first engine was an old dog that Chrysler resurrected and modified from past years.  Later variations of the 1.8L and 2.0L I4 motors perform better.)

I remember these 2 vehicles because of the stark differences.  The Neon I tested was super early, maybe even before full launch.  The specs were not impressive, and it seemed somewhat cobbled together, to be as inexpensive as possible, from the odd parts of past vehicles.  (It was not, of course, but that is sort of the impression.)

Did They Deliver Quality?

So, which of these cars deliver quality?  Remember the definition:  "Quality is what the customer says it is."

When I got my hands on a new Cadillac Allante, I was excited to drive it.  The motor was amazing and the new flagship transmission as well.  The brakes and chassis seemed so awesome too.  After a few laps around the test track, I decided to challenge it a little.  Then, in a high speed broad sweeping corner, the rear broke loose and tried to pass the front.  I don't remember the speed I was going (fast), but suddenly all attention was on keeping the car sunny-side-up.  I did manage to regain control and keep it on the track, but it was a frightening ride.

Armed with the knowledge that the car can suddenly get squirrely, I pushed it again, and in several other ways too.  So Crazy!  The worst part is the car does not give much warning before a loss of control.  While it looks great on paper, all I can say:  "That car is scary!"  For the ways I drive, I could never own one.  The taunting of that wonderfully powerful engine would tempt me constantly over the line and it would end up as my coffin.

What about the Neon?

There was not much impressive with the Neon.  Nothing to get excited about, and nothing to condemn it for either.  Yet, out on the track it behaved well.

Neon ExampleThis car hit the mark.  Of course we can't expect million dollar performance from a cheap economy car, but it did better than I expected.  Sure, it lacked in the acceleration department, and the trim level was certainly economy.  Yes, I was able to shake it loose, but it did so in a predictable manner.

It actually performed well for the category.

I mention these 2 cars to illustrate a point.  In the context of - Quality is what the customer says it is - we compare:

A customer willing to shell out $50+K in 1993 for a Cadillac wants a lot more than the customer paying $9+K for a Neon.  That puts quality and how we deliver quality in context.  The customer context.  So . . . Which car was able to deliver quality?

The Customer Voice

If you're interested in following up, look at how long each model lasted.  Both had revisions, but even with that . . . .

We live in such a disposable world – no thanks to giants like Walmart that push price to the point where as a society we have become consummate consumptionists.  That fact alone has driven how companies deliver quality in their products (or not).  If we now consider most things as disposable, then where is quality?  Where is the need to deliver quality?  Or more accurately, what does the customer say quality is?

Things have also changed significantly in many industries.  In a previous article on Where the Customer fits in QC, we discuss how the trend in software makes the customer the Guinea pig at the whim of the software producer.  We love the idea of always being up to date, but that perception has driven software vendors to deliver quick without proper quality assessments.  It is a spiral of sorts, because the software is never "great".  Indeed, the customer is now the test station.

Both of these trends have their up sides and downs.  More trash in landfills, more demand for resources.  Quicker access to new features, and greater frustration when software bugs foil our progress.

My Questions:

  • Are you happy with the Walmart paradigm of consume and dispose?
  • Do you like being in the customer Guinea pig model?

Please leave your thoughts in the comments area below.  We want to know what you think.  Thank you.

How Do You Deliver Quality?

The concepts of how various industries deliver quality is intriguing.  While trends come and go, ebb and flow, one thing is pretty constant.  People choose what they accept as quality, and companies need to listen.

Innovation is a powerful tool in business, and customers love new and creative things.  The trick is finding the balance of quick delivery with the intelligence of establishing quality.  Prototypes can help, but it is the maker mindset that matters most.

How many of your decisions are driven by perceptions of quality?  Do you read reviews before purchasing something?  Do you read reviews as you choose a restaurant?  Those reviews are actually statements of a customer on perceived quality.  Unfortunately, bias and agenda are always prevalent, but it is a statement nonetheless.

Some deliver quality with service, some in a product.  Still others deliver with electrons.  While all of these come together for the customer in the end, it is so rare that just one thing defines or defies quality.  It can be the sales experience, plus the product, plus the extras.  A really good example is this review on the Pivot Trail 429.

So, How do you deliver quality?  We would love to hear your comments.

One comment on “How Do You Deliver Quality?”

  1. To me this is easy question love what you do take pride in your work and nine times out of 10 you will produce quality if it's for you or a client. Yes I've been known to make prototypes sample buildups as well behind the scenes in really do my clients ever know about it it's weird being a home inspector by day in a carpenter by night slash handyman. There are so many jobs that I do for the very first time that I've never thought about ever doing before and a client asked me if I can do it and of course my answer is yes sir yes ma'am of course no problem I'll make sure you're happy because if I'm not happy you're not happy and that's quality usually by that point in time I'm just throwing a number out there on cost and hopefully it sticks because there's no way in hell on how to price out some of the bogus requests I get I just hope I get it right on the first or second try. Haha

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Articles

Unintended Consequences of AI for Small Business

With the evolution of Artificial Intelligence, AI is promising awesome advancements in business efficiency, improved data management, advanced marketing techniques, and so much more.  However, within the buzz of possibilities, unintended effects and disparities are emerging, particularly with AI for small business. How do we, as small business owners, grab the opportunities for growth and […]

Read More
Learning Creo? – Start With The Paradigms

If pencil and paper design is like walking, then Sketchup is a bike, and Rhino a car.  Fusion 360 is cheap CAD akin to a railroad.  Solidworks is the quintessential Cessna Citation (that PTC wants to be), and

Read More
Creo: Awesome CAD Power, Mired In User Interface Woes

Creo, by PTC, is extremely capable CAD software, maybe the best.  Yet, PTC has wrapped this beautiful gem in a mire of mixed paradigms and inconsistency making it hard to learn and slow-er to use. 

Read More
Case Study:  ChatGPT vs. Experienced Advice

How well can available AI write a technical-ish article?  With all the Buzz lately about AI writing papers for students, that question keeps popping through my head.  I see AI written articles around on the web and I wonder just how complete

Read More
Buying A New Bike – Full Review – '22 Pivot 429 Trail

New bike?  Yup, good day!  Yet, both the path and result have things to think about.  From the perspective of an engineer who does work in the bicycle industry, this is a review of both the bike, a Pivot 429 Trail, and the journey.

Read More
Synthesis Engineering Services

Always Innovative Product Development & Functional Engineering Consulting!

Copyright © 2024 - Synthesis Engineering Services, Inc.
magnifiercross